Flibberty-Jibbitz: Flu Vax Hype

Flu_shot : Images of the H1N1 Influenza Virus

You know me...got to get in my vaccine dig. Probably my last...through this venue at any rate. :)

Yes! Lots of flu going around these days, there's no debate there.

However, what CAN be debated is how all this flu got here. This is the real problem because as it stands, life with the flu in the future will be all too common thanks to the ineffective ways that medical cartel is handling it. More vaccines do NOT equal less flu, in fact there's evidence that more vaccines are creating MORE flu...more virulent types of flu. Take a look at this interview between two physicians who ARE looking at this very dilemma. They have come out of their brainwashed comas induced by medical school to explore the fallacies of their trade.

Take a look:

Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Meryl Nass on Vaccine Adaptations
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/15/dr-nass-on-vaccination.aspx

Story at-a-glance

The widespread use of vaccinations may trigger bacterial adaptations leading to antibiotic-resistant bacterial diseases and vaccine-resistant viral diseases.
This can happen through several mechanisms. These include mutation (Hepatitis B vaccine), reversion to virulence (Oral Polio vaccine) or strain replacement (Prevnar 7). Strain replacement, in the case of Prevnar 7, meant that following widespread vaccination with Prevnar 7, other pneumococcal strains that were not included in the vaccine became much more likely to cause pneumococcal infections. One of these, 19S, was known to be multi-antibiotic resistant.
Hemophilus influenzae cases also increased, filling in the niche that had been created by Prevnar, and about 40% of these infections are multi-drug resistant.
When Prevnar, a vaccine used against pneumonia, meningitis, and bloodstream infections, was first introduced, it protected against seven pneumococcal strains, but was soon linked to an increase in rates of antibiotic-resistant infections due to 19S pneumococci and hemophilus influenzae. The vaccine was then modified to include 13 pneumococcal strains to combat the 19S problem. However, the new vaccine will not improve the increase in hemophilus infections, and may make that problem worse.
In the United States ear infections, sinus infections, bronchitis, pneumonia and meningitis, which are often caused by pneumococcal bacteria or hemophilus, have become much harder and more expensive to treat because of increasing resistance to antibiotics. This is due in part to the widespread use of the Prevnar vaccine.
Vaccines have also been implicated in causing new, vaccine-resistant strains of whooping cough, hepatitis and polio.
more

If these adaptations are possibly occurring for the more dangerous illnesses, why wouldn't it be so for flu? Also, think about it...the flu mist can shed. So it's probable that with the increase in vaccination we may be spreading more virus in more places.

The vaccinated are the vector for spreading illness. Makes sense to me.

One other thing to share...several years ago, I had the privilege of spending some one-on-one time with Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, DO http://drtenpenny.com/home. I've posted about her before and her crusade for researching and presenting the whole picture of vaccines to the public. She's a wealth of knowledge and came out of her own bias years ago as an emergency room physician. While we were getting to know each other over lunch during the health conference, she told me some information about good ol' Dr. Oz. The celebrity doc who kind of promotes natural health on his show.

Well, Sherry is friends with him and especially his wife who was a natural health presenter and vaccine educator at our conference! If you've noticed Dr. Oz promotes flu shots on his show. Sherry has bugged him about this in the past and told me that he claims to know the dangers, but when your pockets are lined by the networks who are partly funded by pharmaceutical giants then $$ wins over truth. Apparently, he's been quoted on television that his wife won't let their kids get flu shots. Here's that link to that dialogue: http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/01/if-dr-oz-spreads-out-the-vaccine-schedule-for-his-kids-why-cant-we.html. Course Sherry told me they don't vaccinate at all.

One other thing in the mainstream news involves the whooping cough. The whooping cough hysteria is revved up every now and then. I presume it's when vaccine sales are low and pharma needs some extra cash for their executive vacations, homes and parties....oh and to buy off a few politicians, can't forget that! Course the whole truth is never told and the blame is usually put on the unvaccinated.

The state of Vermont is recording record highs of whooping cough with a 90% vaccination rate! Wow. Here's the link to that story and and more: http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/whooping-cough-outbreak-involved-90.html

"The DOH recommends that all kids under the age of 7 receive five doses of the vaccine known as DTaP, or the diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine. The DOH calls for children to receive four doses before 18 months of age and another before kindergarten.

The problem with DTaP, as a study published last month in the New England Journal of Medicine shows, is that the vaccine loses its effectiveness. The study compared 277 children, ages 4 to 12, and found that a child’s odds of contracting pertussis increased 42 percent every year after the fifth dose."

So my question is: If the vaccines supposedly loose effectiveness after the 5th dose...then what's the purpose in getting them? Were we created so defectively that we have to subject ourselves to shots for the rest of our lives to supposedly stay "protected"?